Toward the end of 2024, the IRS released the highly anticipated rules that broker-dealers and DeFi platforms will need to follow, following the extension of existing broker-dealer rules (under Section 6045) to centralized broker-dealers. Essentially, the stated goals of these rule extensions and changes are to require crypto brokers – whether operating on a centralized or decentralized basis – to follow rules similar to those long followed by TradFi brokers. Specifically, some of the main drivers of these changes focus on 1) seeking to crack down on illicit transactions carried out via DeFi platforms, and 2) improving the transparency and traceability of these transactions. Aside from the fact that only a very small percentage of all crypto transactions are associated with illicit or criminal activity, the IRS has been working toward this goal for years.
Additionally, it should be noted that these proposed expansions to the reporting and data collection requirements of Section 6045 will only take effect for transactions occurring after January 1, 2027. They are separate from the requirements related to Form 1099-DA , which will be the declaration. mechanism used by centralized crypto brokers for transactions made after January 1, 2025. The tax implications and reporting obligations of these changes could change as regulations are finalized – and could be modified with the new Trump administration – but There are several things crypto investors and advocates should watch for as tax changes continue to influence crypto markets.
Tax changes are subject to interpretation
With the new Trump administration, it is almost guaranteed that there will be discussions and debates around these tax changes as to how they will change the crypto industry. Given that while the IRS may announce code changes, but Treasury is the most common enforcement mechanism, there is also room for interpretation and differing views on the implementation of these tax changes. Additionally, given that the Trump campaign and transition team have publicly supported the crypto sector and made overtures to the sector – leading to a rise in the prices of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies – it would be reasonable to assume that any tax changes that would negatively impact the space would be challenged.
Specifically, and something that would build on the expectations of the pro-crypto executive orders regarding the creation of a strategic bitcoin reserve would be that the new administration and Congress could adjust/modify these regulations as they come into play. walk. Another point worth considering is that, during his election campaign, the Trump campaign indicated its desire to eliminate the capital gains tax for Bitcoin investors and traders. Given all of this, it remains to be seen how these tax changes will be both interpreted and applied.
Privacy Coins May Rebound
One of the main points and goals of the IRS changes is to improve the transparency and traceability of crypto transactions, but these changes have also been met with opposition from the crypto industry. After the 2024 election and the over $100 million spent by the crypto lobby in that election, it would be reasonable to expect Bitcoin and the broader tokenized asset class to continue to grow . As TradFi continues to make significant inroads into tokenized payments, the importance and attention given to privacy considerations will only increase. As many in the crypto industry have opposed these tax code changes, fears of a CBDC have not yet completely died down and centralized stablecoins continue to gain market share indicate an opportunity for privacy coins. re-emerge as part of the market.
Although privacy coins may have initially been associated (by some) with individuals seeking to obscure transaction history for illicit purposes, this inaccurate assumption overlooks the fundamental attributes that make privacy coins attractive to investors. For example, improved zero-knowledge proofs, faster transaction confirmations, and other crypto options have made these tokens both more useful to larger parts of the market and more accepted by crypto traders. As the IRS continues to require more information, without necessarily providing tools and frameworks to properly report this information, privacy coins and improved encryption (which makes traceability easier) could be more attractive to the community crypto.
Stablecoin exemptions will be requested
Given that the growth and use of stablecoins has continued virtually unabated, the reality is that investors and crypto policy advocates would be wise to seek an exemption or other preferred tax status for these transactions. Stablecoins, by design and use case, are specifically designed to have lower price volatility (ideally zero) and to serve as a medium of exchange against an investment or asset class. Even with these facts, however, stablecoin use triggers the same tax filings, data collection, and potential liabilities created by other, more volatile cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin. With a market capitalization in the hundreds of billions, users signing up every day, and institutional and retail interest continuing to rise, stablecoins appear well-positioned for strong growth in 2025. To this end, it It would also be reasonable that – despite their unpopularity as the tax reporting and collection changes have come to market – investors and advocates will seek exclusions, exemptions or other favorable tax treatments for this subset of crypto.
2025 has just begun and is already shaping up to be a high-impact year for the crypto space; Investors and policy advocates would do well to remain vigilant as changes continue to occur in the market.