I've been seeing the evolution of naming different tokens such as meme or shitcoins but I think there's one that hasn't really been defined which is Reputation.
Though all coins and tokens are valued by their reputation, if someone has the rights to mint, burn or control the token regardless of the wealth of the owner (Single or Group), the value is based on the reputation of ownership.
The reason I propose differentiating this from others is because it clearly defines the token/ coin brand and that it's in some way regulated by some degree of centralized control.
It's important to know and understand the behaviors of each token and by ensuring a standardized naming convention, we can ensure higher crypto literacy through understanding.
The example I have with mine is I wouldn't renounce control over my personal token, which I believe will be more common place in the future, everyone may soon have one or more tokens to their name as a form of reputation. There will be finite coins like Bitcoin, those that can increase in number through contribution and regulated coins with a person or persons acting like the bank or federal reserve of their token.
