US Lawmakers Bring Crypto Regulation Back to the Top of the World legislative agenda, with a market structure and stablecoin policy set to be renewed in January 2026. After months of stalled negotiations, both houses of Congress are preparing hearings and procedural steps that could shape how digital assets are regulated in the United States.
Attention now turns to the committee calendars, where early January dates signal the first concrete push of the new year. Lawmakers and industry observers view this window as a test of whether bipartisan dynamics can translate into binding rules for crypto markets.
Market Structure Bill Heads Towards Senate Decision
Attention is focused on the Senate Banking Committee, which is preparing to introduce a market structure proposal aimed at clarifying regulatory authority over digital assets. The bill seeks to define when a token falls under securities law and when it is considered a commodity, thereby drawing clearer lines between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Committee leaders indicated that January would bring a formal review of the text, including a markup process in which senators would debate amendments and vote on the final text. This step is important because it determines whether the bill can be returned to the Senate later in the session.
Meanwhile, the House has already adopted its own version of market structure legislation. As a result, January discussions are expected to focus on aligning the Senate’s language with the House’s framework, setting up negotiations that could eventually lead to a unified bill.
Stablecoin Monitoring Moves Towards Implementation
Stablecoins form the second pillar of the January agenda, even if the legislative posture differs from the market structure. Congress approved a stablecoin framework last year, establishing rules for dollar-backed tokens, reserve requirements and issuer oversight.
As 2026 dawns, the focus is on how regulators will apply these rules in practice. Federal agencies should set oversight standards, licensing pathways, and compliance deadlines for issuers operating under the new law.
Lawmakers plan to use the January hearings to review initial implementation and address gaps that emerged after the bill passed. These sessions could also influence future amendments, particularly regarding the role of banks, payment companies and non-bank issuers in the stablecoin ecosystem.
Why January is important for crypto policy
January represents a crucial inflection point as the committee’s action sets the tone for the rest of the year. Hearings and markings do not guarantee passage, but they signal political commitment and establish negotiating positions.
For the crypto industry, this phase offers clearer signals than grand political speeches or draft proposals. Concrete dates and committee votes show whether Washington is ready to move from debate to rules ready for application.
As lawmakers return from vacation, crypto regulation is back on the Congress calendar. The results of the January sessions will determine how quickly the United States moves toward a more defined digital asset framework in 2026.
