The world of digital assets is evolving rapidly, and 2024 and 2025 have been in great years for the regulation of American cryptography. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a burst of new declarations and orientations, approaching everything, of the same and stablescoins to the arcanic details of the implementation of the protocol and the recording of crypto assets. Meanwhile, the Congress intervened with the revolutionary Genius Act, the first law of the country’s stable stables.7 Together, these developments mark both a maturation of the regulatory approach and an overview of the battles and challenges to come.
Unpacking the new position of the dry
For years, the dryer’s approach to digital assets has been criticized as a mixture of application regulations and unclear signals. This is why the recent series of declarations of the Corporation Finance Division is notable: for the first time, the SEC has tried to trace brighter lines around some of the most confusing problems in the industry.
Take the coins, for example. These often viral tokens, born from culture and speculation on the Internet, have already existed in a regulatory gray area. The recent DEC declaration specifies that, provided that these parts are lacking in functionalities such as profit, managerial surveillance or a promise of returns, their purchase and their sale will not generally be treated as securities transactions.1
Clarification of the dry on the stablecoins is undoubtedly even more consecutive. For years, the debate has raged on the question of whether stablecoins, which are digital assets generally fixed to the US dollar and supported by reserves, should be treated as titles, basic products or something else. The new guidelines establish a crucial distinction – “covered” ecunines, which means that those entirely supported by high -quality reserves and set for fiduciary currency do not fall under securities laws when they are simply purchased or sold as payment.2 In summary, the stablecoins covered for payment are not treated as securities, which makes their regulatory path more clearly and opening industry to growth.
The development of the protocol, too, obtains its moment of clarity. The practice, which consists in locking the tokens to support a blockchain network in exchange for awards, was a head of conformity for discussions and the DEFI platforms. The dry now indicates that, in most cases, the direct implementation of the protocol without regrouping of profits or dependence on a third party does not constitute a transaction in securities. (3
Most pragmatically for businesses, commission declarations on registration deposits finally offer concrete procedural orientations for those who seek to issue tokens or titles related to crypto, describing the forms and disclosure expected in this transition period.4 Emitters now have more precise steps for recording, which reduces uncertainty.
How the act genius changes the landscape
Although recent DSA declarations have provided additional clarity to digital assets, it is important to remember that these are just advice, not on the law. On the other hand, the Genius Act (guiding and establishing national innovation for American stablecoins), signed in July 2025, marks a major change in the way stablecoins are regulated. 2, 6
With the adoption of the Act on Engineering, the SEC has indeed presented the main surveillance of the Stablescoin market to federal banking agencies. However, it retains its competence on certain transactions involving stallions which are negotiated, negotiated or kept by entities and exchanges regulated by the dry. The law creates a federal license regime, establishes reserve and audit requirements and establishes explicit protections for consumers for stablecoin issuers. The Genius Act is designed to encourage innovation, promote responsible competition and mitigate risks such as fraud and improper use. Stablecoin transmitters must now comply with this federal license and specific surveillance framework.
What’s uncertain?
Even with these developments, many is always in the air. The “no security” statements for the Even parts and covered stables are only applied in specific circumstances.1, 2 If a project does not clearly disclose important details, such as its operations, its reservations, its management team or its risks, it can be considered as lacking in transparency and could still be classified as security under American law. Likewise, the implementation services and the DEFI projects which promise gathered yields or are based on the management efforts of a centralized party, are in no way clear.3 The “test Howy”, the legal standard to determine what matters as an investment contract, continues to play a major role.5. In summary, regardless of the recent DSA directives, projects that do not have complete disclosure or are structured to share the profits or operate under centralized leadership can always be the scope of securities regulations. This means that they could be subject to more strict surveillance and requirements under US law. The deepest uncertainty may concern tokenization. The statements of the dry on token titles, where traditional equity or debt are issued or negotiated on blockchains, are better understood as a warning: technology does not delete the need for legal compliance.6 Tokenized assets are always subject to the monitoring of the dry and the rules of conformity are still evolving.
In addition to this, the regulatory war between the dry, the CFTC, the banking regulators and the state authorities is far from being settled. The congress signaling its desire to adopt legislation on digital assets, future jurisdictional boundaries remain fluid.8
Pending: what to watch
The next twelve months will be a crucible for the regulation of American digital assets. The implementation of the law on engineering will test if a banking style regime can provide both innovation and stability in stablecoins.5, 7 At the dry, all eyes are on the next framework of the Crypto Task Force, which promises more complete and perhaps durable answers for market recording, challenge and tokenization.4
At the same time, the market goes ahead. New mechanisms for products negotiated in exchange for crypto could arouse more institutional interest and a meticulous examination 8And pilot projects for tokenized titles or regulatory sand stores could soon emerge.
Although recent actions have brought more clarity, many remain unstable. Continuous collaboration between regulators, legislators and innovators will be essential to shape the future of the digital asset sector.4, 7
Do you have any questions? Connect with a CBIZ professional today.
References
Dry.gov | Declaration of staff on documents even
Dry.gov | Declaration on Stablecoins
Dry.gov | Declaration on certain protocol pace activities
Dry.gov | Offerings and registration of securities in the cryptographic asset markets
Dry.gov | Investor bulletin: the “Howy test” and investment contracts
Dry.gov | Enchanting, but not magic: a declaration on the tokenization of titles
Dry.gov | Declaration on President Trump signing the law on law in law
Dry.gov | Products negotiated on the stock market of cryptographic assets
