Close Menu
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Categories
  • Altcoins (1,457)
  • Analysis (1,640)
  • Bitcoin (2,229)
  • Blockchain (1,318)
  • DeFi (1,541)
  • Ethereum (1,509)
  • Event (56)
  • Exclusive Deep Dive (1)
  • Landscape Ads (2)
  • Market (1,584)
  • Press Releases (2)
  • Reddit (879)
  • Regulation (1,480)
  • Security (2,108)
  • Thought Leadership (3)
  • Videos (41)
Hand picked
  • Ethereum Staking Hits Record High: 29.02% Of Supply Locked Signals Long-Term Conviction
  • Europol storms $ 540 million Crypto money laundering network
  • ChainLink Ace is online while Link approaches the breakdown zone from $ 14 to $ 16
  • Cardano (ADA) laterally – intact support, but no spark for a movement
  • NFT sales fell from $ 1.6 billion to T1 2025 to $ 1.3 billion in T2 2025
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Events
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
Home»Blockchain»Basel Committee Explores How Banks Can Mitigate Permissionless Blockchain Risks – Ledger Insights
Blockchain

Basel Committee Explores How Banks Can Mitigate Permissionless Blockchain Risks – Ledger Insights

August 30, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Basel Permissionless Blockchains.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Yesterday, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published a paper exploring the risks associated with permissionless blockchains and how they can be addressed. Recently, the Basel Committee highlighted that it does not believe banks can adequately mitigate the risks associated with permissionless blockchains. As a result, crypto rules for banks make it very costly to hold assets on permissionless blockchains, including digital securities or tokenized versions of conventional securities. Digital securities issued on permissioned blockchains are treated more or less like conventional securities.

Most public blockchains are permissionless. However, the Basel Committee does not see a problem with the public aspect. It is the permissionless aspect that it finds most problematic.

The article represents the views of the author, not necessarily those of the Basel Committee. It describes known issues, such as the risks of a blockchain hard fork and the lack of validator oversight. It explores KYC, AML, and CFT challenges and the lack of settlement finality on many DLTs.

This reminds us of a prediction made a few years ago by Caitlin Long of Custodia Bank: “Bitcoin is going to bring down a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) at some point because they don’t understand that the settlement risk is very different between bitcoin and traditional assets.”

One of the most difficult issues with many permissionless blockchains is low transaction throughput, which becomes a bigger problem in a crisis when everyone is heading for the exits simultaneously.

Managing Permissionless Blockchain Risks

While the steps to address permissionless blockchain risks are well known, this may be the first time anyone has documented them in a useful list. We think there is a good chance that the list will become more formal. As the Basel Committee becomes more comfortable with workarounds, it may relax the permissionless blockchain rule, but only if banks engage in assets and activities that qualify. From that perspective, this document could be important.

The first step is to plan for business continuity (BCP), for example by having an off-chain copy of asset ownership. This could also define an alternative blockchain where assets could be moved in the event of a crisis.

Many institutional tokens already use allowlisting, though denylisting is another option. Zero-knowledge proofs are mentioned as a path to privacy-preserving identity, though we favor truly decentralized identity.

Another commonly used de-risking strategy is to specify a token gatekeeper that can reverse fraudulent transactions and resolve other issues. This is a concept that crypto enthusiasts reject due to their “trust no one” philosophy. On the other hand, this same group has a strange willingness to park hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars in unregulated asset managers without independent oversight. For regulated institutions, the gatekeeper concept is a no-brainer.

In theory, privacy issues can be solved with privacy-preserving layer-2 permissioned chains. Alternatives include sidechains and various types of cryptography. Layer-2 chains can also solve congestion issues, but they still rely on layer-1 for final settlement.

Which public DLTs are already considered permissioned?

There are a number of authorized public chains, although most of them do not have a large number of users. Among the most institutional ones are the IDB’s LACChain, Alastria in Spain, EBSI and the European Public Network.

According to the Basel Committee definition, we believe that Hedera public DLT qualifies as permissioned and has a reasonable user base. The 31 corporate board members control the nodes that write to the network. These members include Google, IBM, Shinhan Bank, Standard Bank, Worldpay, Nomura, and abrdn. Another advantage is that Hedera offers fast settlement finality. However, Hedera does not intend to remain permissionless indefinitely. Once the board number reaches 39, it aims to transition to a permissionless situation.

Returning to methodologies to mitigate the risks associated with lack of authorization, the article concludes that “practices to mitigate these risks are in various stages of development and have generally not been pressure tested.”

Note: The author has no personal or financial interest in Hedera or associated tokens.




Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleIs it too late to buy Neiro? Neiro Solana price skyrockets 45%, and it could be the next crypto to explode
Next Article Immunefi: Cryptocurrency theft decreases in August 2024, DeFi remains the most vulnerable

Related Posts

Blockchain

5 emerging cryptocurrencies influencing blockchain trends

July 1, 2025
Blockchain

the elimination of binance and the evolution of an innovative blockchain

July 1, 2025
Blockchain

Why artists turn to XRP for freedom of creation

June 30, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Single Page Post
Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Featured Content
Event

Philippine Blockchain Week 2025 Welcomes Global Web3 Trailblazers to Manila

June 9, 2025

Manila, Philippines – June 9, 2025 — As Philippine Blockchain Week (PBW) 2025 returns for…

Event

ETHMilan 2025 Returns With a Stellar Line-Up at One of Milan’s Most Iconic Venues

June 5, 2025

Milan, Italy – Mark your calendars! ETHMilan, Italy’s largest international Ethereum and Web3 conference, is…

1 2 3 … 49 Next
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

ChainLink Ace is online while Link approaches the breakdown zone from $ 14 to $ 16

July 1, 2025

TonCoin: Can an increase of 42% in whale entries propel ton $ 3.28?

July 1, 2025

Solana Rival following herself for major outperformance after correction, according to the CEO of Real Vision, Raoul Pal

June 30, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
© 2025 Altcoin Observer. all rights reserved by Tech Team.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 106,850.63
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,460.08
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.21
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 652.62
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 151.27
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.278566
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.162671
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,459.59