From FBI Investigations to Crypto Compliance
Stephanie Talamantez has seen both sides of the digital asset world. She spent years as an FBI special agent investigating cryptocurrency crimes and now helps recover stolen assets at Guidepost Solutions. His experience gives him a unique perspective on how fraud works in this space and where companies go wrong when it comes to compliance.
I think her journey is interesting because she started getting interested in crypto crimes in 2014. That’s early, very early. She has seen technology evolve alongside the criminal methods that exploit it. This dual perspective allows him to spot risks that others might overlook, patterns that aren’t obvious unless you’ve seen how investigations actually work.
The rise of sophisticated social engineering
One trend she’s noticed recently is the rise in social engineering scams. These are no longer just phishing emails. Bad actors collect personal information from data breaches, social media, and other sources to create very convincing scenarios.
They can pose as customer service, using enough real details about a person to overcome their initial hesitation. The victim thinks they are securing their assets, but in reality they are transferring them to criminals. The worrying thing is that even the most financially savvy people fall for these schemes. Anxiety over losing crypto assets creates this perfect environment for manipulation.
Finding stolen funds through blockchains
Talamantez describes tracing as an art and a science. With chain hopping, decentralized exchanges, and bridges, this gets complicated quickly. There are blockchain explorers and commercial tools, but effective tracing typically requires combining multiple methods.
Some platforms have their own internal explorers that list hot wallet addresses. Investigators must match USD values and timestamps on all swaps. The key, she says, is to stay flexible and constantly update your toolbox. There is no one-size-fits-all solution, as different fraud schemes present themselves differently on-chain.
Compliance Gaps and Regulatory Uncertainty
This is where things get complicated. The digital assets industry is reluctant to adopt the same compliance standards as traditional banking services. But cryptocurrencies inevitably interact with banks, which are subject to established regulations. Gaps typically appear in KYC/AML procedures and transaction monitoring.
Many decentralized platforms lack robust controls. Financial institutions may not have the tools to fully trace transactions or properly assess risks. This makes banks reluctant to partner with crypto companies. And many crypto companies are taking a “wait and see” approach due to changing regulations, which could create vulnerabilities down the road.
Another challenge is international collaboration. Crypto is rapidly crossing borders, making traditional legal processes impractical. Although some exchanges comply with international subpoenas, they do not always honor third-party requests. Law enforcement must be involved in asset recovery, but resources are limited.
Practical advice to protect yourself
Talamantez offers some simple advice. First, pause before taking action. If someone contacts you about your crypto, hang up and verify through a trusted channel. Do not click on unsolicited links. This moment of hesitation can prevent fraud.
For businesses, she suggests establishing strong compliance frameworks from the start. Have third parties stress test them. But perhaps more importantly, focus on employee training. Most business fraud incidents stem from human factors: people clicking on phishing links, sharing information, or reusing passwords.
The regulatory focus appears to be shifting towards stablecoins, while other areas remain in a gray area. Financial institutions should prepare their infrastructure for stablecoin integration and strengthen their transaction monitoring systems.
It’s a complex landscape, but Talamantez believes thoughtful controls can limit criminal activity without stifling innovation. The key is finding that balance, which is easier said than done.
![]()


