Close Menu
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Categories
  • Altcoins (1,375)
  • Analysis (1,561)
  • Bitcoin (2,147)
  • Blockchain (1,257)
  • DeFi (1,475)
  • Ethereum (1,477)
  • Event (56)
  • Exclusive Deep Dive (1)
  • Landscape Ads (2)
  • Market (1,518)
  • Press Releases (1)
  • Reddit (799)
  • Regulation (1,418)
  • Security (2,035)
  • Thought Leadership (2)
  • Videos (41)
Hand picked
  • CCIP-113 – Implementing pinned image posts
  • Bitcoin Price Watch: $ 105,000 The new battlefield for bulls and bears?
  • Daily users of the large XRP book jump from 7x to 295k-is a price change?
  • Arthur Hayes: Stablecoin stock exchange explode with “hot potatoes”
  • BTC becomes the new favorite of capital, Sunnyminging seizes the entry of stable income for institutions
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Events
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
Home»Regulation»Illinois is on the verge of massive cryptography regulations. Entrepreneurs will pay the price.
Regulation

Illinois is on the verge of massive cryptography regulations. Entrepreneurs will pay the price.

May 6, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Uuidc7371deb 2bd2 5593 ae6c a9f83a338ef5functionfittypepreview.jpeg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Katherine Kirkpatrick Bos

The General Assembly of Illinois has advanced a scanning measure which will have enormous consequences for the technological ecosystem of Chicago and the more than 300 innovative innovative startups and institutions in the blockchain and cryptocurrency in Illinois.

The law on digital assets and consumer protection (DACPA) – sponsored by the Senator of the Mark Walker State of Buffalo Grove – was offered under the cover of consumer protection, but, in reality, would not do much to protect consumers from Illinois. If he is signed, he would impose heavy regulations and a regime for granting heavy licenses to Illinois entrepreneurs and would give a radical regulatory authority to the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation of Illinois (IDFPR), an agency in the midst of the modernization of its processes to minimize license delays.

Let me be clear: the community of digital assets – including blockchain and cryptographic entrepreneurs – supports intelligent and targeted regulations to protect consumers and keep the bad players responsible. But this bill does not realize it, and it will fail for entrepreneurs and consumers in several ways.

First, the bill offers Illinois consumers a false feeling of security against cryptographic fraud and bad players, the majority of which operates in Offshore and will not adhere to the requirements of this legislation. Legitimate crypto companies based in Chicago overall are not those that target elderly consumers, but they will bear the costs of this bill.

Second, the bill would regulate not only centralized exchanges or other companies that hold the crypto for Illinois users, but would potentially extend to a multitude of startups, students and technologists experimenting with means of using blockchain to solve real problems. The result would be a two -level system innovation where well -resourced inherited organizations will be the only ones with capital and resources to navigate licenses. It works against everything that Illinois represents.

In addition, the operating cryptocurrency companies are already subject to a lot of surveillance. The Department of Financial and Professional Regulation of Illinois, the Attorney General of Illinois, the American Commission for Securities and Exchange, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the Ministry of Justice could all bring actions against someone who fraud a resident of Illinois. Beyond that, many companies that interact with the financial assets of Illinois consumers are required to have a silver issuer license issued through the IDFPR, and companies holding cryptographic assets may also need to request an Illinois trust license. The addition of bureaucracy and confusion to this booming industry does not serve anyone.

Also concerning this bill assumes that the IDFPR – which already operates on binding resources – is ready to regulate one of the most complex and fastest sectors in the world in the coming months with just the handful of new employees they would hire. The agency is already responsible for regulating professional licenses for more than 1.2 million residents of Illinois, and it has struggled to keep the pace of existing demand. Last year, Illinois doctors and nurses found themselves at risk of losing their jobs due to delayed licenses.

On its credit, the IDFPR has deployed a new online application system – Core – four months ago. But to date, the agency has only converted three of its more than 300 licenses to the online system and have declared publicly that it would take more than two years to convert the rest. It is irresponsible to assume that it can manage the licenses for the multitude of companies providing cryptocurrency services to residents of Illinois with such a short track.

The Illinois does not have to guess what will happen if these bills are signed. We can simply turn to New York State, which promulgated a similar license regime – the New York Bitlengende – via regulatory advice in 2015. Since then, the state regulation organization has only approved 34 BIT license applications, stimulating many cryptographic companies to residents of Geoblock New York. The version of the Illinois of the license extends a wider regulatory authority than Bitlidense in New York, so it is sure to say that the consequences will be more important.

Currently, we see a substantial number of crypto companies considering reminders in the United States, and with regulations like DACPA, Illinois will continue to fall from the list of realistic places to build technology companies.

Although legislators can believe that they protect consumers, they push innovators, investors and job creators to more friendly jurisdictions. Illinois needs a regulatory structure for cryptocurrency which is closely targeted, functional and manageable. Until the IDFPR is entirely modernized and the law is considerably reduced to scope, the Senate bill 1797 and Bill 742 of the Chamber should not go ahead.

• The Senate bill 1797 adopted the Illinois Senate on April 10. April 17.

• Katherine Kirkpatrick Bos is a Starkware general lawyer, developer of a cryptographic system of proof of zero knowledge who seeks to improve the scalability of blockchains, and a member of the board of directors of the Illinois Blockchain Association.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleLeader House Dem will block the hearing of the Crypto Market Structure Bill
Next Article Build the future of payments with the community

Related Posts

Regulation

Cryptographic companies are preparing for closer monitoring of the United Kingdom as FCA integration with financial markets | Article

June 17, 2025
Regulation

A hinge shaping the regulation of cryptocurrencies

June 17, 2025
Regulation

Vietnam adopts the law to recognize cryptographic assets

June 16, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Single Page Post
Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Featured Content
Event

Philippine Blockchain Week 2025 Welcomes Global Web3 Trailblazers to Manila

June 9, 2025

Manila, Philippines – June 9, 2025 — As Philippine Blockchain Week (PBW) 2025 returns for…

Event

ETHMilan 2025 Returns With a Stellar Line-Up at One of Milan’s Most Iconic Venues

June 5, 2025

Milan, Italy – Mark your calendars! ETHMilan, Italy’s largest international Ethereum and Web3 conference, is…

1 2 3 … 49 Next
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Daily users of the large XRP book jump from 7x to 295k-is a price change?

June 17, 2025

Easy provides the crypto investment in Telegram via your blockchain

June 17, 2025

Why overvoltage from 60% to 7 days of aerodrome finance means that $ 1 could fall!

June 17, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
© 2025 Altcoin Observer. all rights reserved by Tech Team.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 105,604.29
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,563.51
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.22
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 654.27
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 150.67
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.279045
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.172197
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,563.69