Close Menu
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Categories
  • Altcoins (2,772)
  • Analysis (2,917)
  • Bitcoin (3,524)
  • Blockchain (2,125)
  • DeFi (2,586)
  • Ethereum (2,420)
  • Event (101)
  • Exclusive Deep Dive (1)
  • Landscape Ads (2)
  • Market (2,652)
  • Press Releases (11)
  • Reddit (2,200)
  • Regulation (2,441)
  • Security (3,387)
  • Thought Leadership (3)
  • Uncategorized (2)
  • Videos (43)
Hand picked
  • Step Finance Treasury Breach: A Case Study in Operational Security Failure
  • Hong Kong sets rules for crypto margin financing and perpetual trading
  • DCR Price Prediction – Sell-off Complete, Is Recovery Next for the Altcoin?
  • Bitcoin and Altcoins Consolidate in Search of a New Price Floor
  • Crypto hackers move stolen funds in two seconds before disclosure
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Events
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
Home»Regulation»Legal experts recommend a flexible approach to dry to define tokens as titles
Regulation

Legal experts recommend a flexible approach to dry to define tokens as titles

April 20, 2025No Comments
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Sec 1.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


The DEFI EDUCATION FUND (DEF) submitted a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 18, offering five basic principles to create a “Token security scheme” framework to support decentralized financing initiatives, while wider regulatory legislation is pending.

The recommendations aim to help the dry structure an exemption from time limited in time for token projects that develop towards decentralization, offering a regulatory environment which facilitates disclosure without prematurely classifying assets as titles.

Technology Regulations

The DEF stressed that any security port should adopt a technological agnostic approach. The framework must meet the risks of activities rather than prescribing rules for specific blockchain models or technical implementations.

The letter has warned of specific technologies, declaring that it could suffocate innovation if the SEC inadvertently favors specific consensus or architectural conception mechanisms.

Regarding eligibility, DEF argued that the port of Safe should be open to a wide range of projects that intend to decentralize. Rather than assessing the status of a token only to its Genesis, the dry should allow the tokens already distributed to qualify, provided that they achieve decentralization objectives.

He argued that wide eligibility criteria are necessary to guarantee the inclusion of projects launched before establishing a clear regulatory framework for future compliance routes.

With regard to disclosure requirements, the DEF pleaded for carefully calibrated obligations that balance the needs for information on the realities faced by development teams at an early stage.

The group has suggested transparency of the source code, the token economy, governance structures, team and initiate activities, cybersecurity audits and development road sheets.

The DEF also proposed periodic disclosure throughout the refuge period, considering the rationalization of conformity thanks to the connectivity of the API and the automation of the blockchain. Additional compliance measures, such as locking periods for initiates, could help align incentralization incentralizations without plans in a surbingon.

Clear output criteria

The letter highlighted the importance of establishing a clear “output test” which defines when a project has sufficiently decentralized to no longer be considered security under American law.

The key criteria for passing the output test would include maximum transparency, participation without authorization, asset custody, centralized lack of control, fully automated transaction processes and the absence of an economic authority preserved by a single group.

The DEF has recommended a realistic period for projects to respond to these benchmarks, like three to four years. Projects that do not meet the criteria in the initial window can request a prolonged refuge period, provided they demonstrate efforts in good faith to decentralize.

An essential element of the DEF proposal involved protections for secondary market players.

Although a token remains in the port of Safe, intermediaries supporting its exchanges, such as exchanges of digital assets and market manufacturers, should not be required to register as brokers or exchanges of securities.

Complete framework required

The DEF noted that the exemption from provider providers of traditional securities regulations would reduce legal uncertainty and promote a broader participation in decentralized markets.

While supporting the creation of a safe port, the DEF finally called on the congress to develop a complete legislative framework for digital assets.

The organization expressed that sustainable legal clarity should come from the law rather than temporary regulatory cuts. Nevertheless, a well -structured refuge could protect investors and promoters while the longer legal process takes place.

The DEF concluded its letter by committing to a continuous commitment to the SEC and the wider cryptography community. The organization also indicated that it would publicly publish its recommendations to request additional comments.

Last Alpha Market report



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleAI Crypto Platform Subbd to Boom while VCs pour $ 917 million into a decentralized AI
Next Article These 4 outsiders make waves – one might be the best crypto to buy this month

Related Posts

Regulation

Hong Kong remains committed to digital assets but feels competition from ‘aggressive’ UAE

February 12, 2026
Regulation

Indian legislator calls for legal status for cryptocurrencies and stable coins to prevent them from being exported abroad: “Let’s not be afraid of innovation, let’s regulate it”

February 11, 2026
Regulation

Regulation, Derivatives Help TradFi Institutions Get Into Crypto, Panelists Say

February 11, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Single Page Post
Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Featured Content
Event

Crypto Expo Europe 2026: Eastern Europe’s Flagship Web3 Event Returns to Bucharest

January 29, 2026

Bucharest, Romania – March 1-2, 2026 – The countdown has begun for one of the…

Event

What impact is the recently approved crypto regulation having in Brazil? The answer will be at MERGE São Paulo this March

January 28, 2026

SÃO PAULO, JANUARY 28, 2026 – São Paulo city will host Latin America’s leading debate…

1 2 3 … 72 Next
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

DCR Price Prediction – Sell-off Complete, Is Recovery Next for the Altcoin?

February 12, 2026

LayerZero’s ZRO jumps 30% after Cathie Wood endorses ‘Zero’ channel

February 12, 2026

Sam Bankman-Fried calls for new trial from FTX citing new testimony

February 11, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
© 2026 Altcoin Observer. all rights reserved by Tech Team.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 67,210.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,973.23
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.99936
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.38
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 615.61
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999898
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 80.64
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.278741
jusd
JUSD (JUSD) $ 0.999053
figure-heloc
Figure Heloc (FIGR_HELOC) $ 1.05