
New York could soon add another chapter to its already strict cryptographic regulatory game book. Bill 8966 of the Assembly, introduced by the member of the Democratic Assembly, Phil Steck, offers an excise tax of 0.2% on all cryptographic transactions and NFT, in particular Bitcoin, Ethereum and Stablecoins.
If it is approved, the cryptographic tax would take effect on September 1, by applying to individuals and institutions merging digital assets in the state.
Although 0.2% may seem low, the cumulative impact on high -frequency traders and large -scale transactions could be significant. A bitcoin sale of $ 50,000, for example, would lead to a tax of $ 100.
Revenues, however, would not only go to the General State Fund, it would be reserved for the prevention and intervention programs of drug addiction in New York State schools.
New York regulatory history and market concerns
New York has a strict history of strict crypto. In 2015, the Bitlidense framework became one of the first complete regulatory regimes in the United States, which prompted certain companies to leave the state due to burden of conformity.
Now, this proposed tax could again reshape commercial behavior, potentially pushing traders to states with more favorable laws such as Texas or Washington.
Critics warn that the new Levy could discourage innovation and stimulate New York cryptographic activity, weakening its hub status for blockchain startups and financial technology.
Supporters argue that the cryptographic tax is modest and has a clear social advantage, which makes it a fair compromise for the long -term stability of the industry.
BTC's price trends to the upside on the daily chart, despite the potential crypto regulatory implications in the US. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview
What the tax regulation of cryptography for investors means
Before becoming law, Bill 8966 of the Assembly must take the examination of the Committee, a complete vote of the Assembly, the Senate, and finally, guarantee the signing of the governor. Cryptographic industry should put pressure sharply during this process, invoking concerns about competitiveness and market liquidity.
If it is adopted, New York’s decision could create a precedent for cryptographic taxation models at the state level, in particular in the absence of federal rules. Other states can follow suit, especially if the tax generates significant income without seriously harming market participation.
For the moment, merchants and investors are careful. Bitcoin recently reached $ 124,000, any change in transaction costs could influence negotiation strategies, and if the fears of a sale materialize, the impact could be felt far beyond New York borders.
Cover the image of chatgpt, BTCUSD graphic of tradingView

Editorial process Because the bitcoinist is centered on the supply of in -depth, precise and impartial content. We confirm strict supply standards, and each page undergoes a diligent review by our team of high -level technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity, relevance and value of our content for our readers.