

According to DefiOasis, Polymarket now has more than 1.7 million business addresses. Yet only about 30% of them made a profit. Simply put, around seven out of ten addresses traded on Polymarket ended up losing money.
The numbers paint a clear picture of the inequality of outcomes in onchain markets, even when participation is broad and transparent.
A small group wins most of the winnings
The data highlights a high concentration of profits at the top. Winning over $1,000 already places an address in the top 4.9% of all Polymarket traders. Go a little higher and the gap widens quickly. Less than 0.04% of addresses captured more than 70% of all profits made on the platform. This means that a small group of very successful traders walked away with most of the gains.
The most profitable addresses brought in modest sums. The largest group of winners won between $0 and $1,000, suggesting that consistent small wins are more common than big successes. On the other hand, around 1.1 million addresses suffered losses between $0 and $1,000. These users likely made a handful of trades, paid fees, and missed the timing or results with low margins. This reflects what traditional markets have shown for decades: many participants trade, but only a few significantly outperform.
170% of Polymarket 30%; ~ 70%
Exchange rate 0.04% Exchange rate 70%
0 – 1,000… pic.twitter.com/jAj3SXsxVO
– defioasis.eth (@defioasis) December 29, 2025
A real-world comparison is useful. Retail stock traders during the boom of 2020 and 2021 also experienced uneven results. Studies later showed that a small fraction of active traders captured most of the profits, while many others lost small but consistent amounts over time. Polymarket appears to be following a similar path, only on-chain.
Learn more about Polymarket
An anonymous Polymarket trader turned a modest $1,000 stake into approximately $2 million by exploiting microstructure arbitrage, a strategy that takes advantage of small price gaps created by order flow and timing. Rather than making big directional bets, the trader executed more than 13,000 high-frequency trades, buying and selling contracts repeatedly to capture tiny inefficiencies that most users overlook.
🔥 INTERESTING: An anonymous Polymarket trader returns between $1,000 and $2 million via microstructure arbitrage, executing over 13,000 high-frequency trades. pic.twitter.com/wxiEvuRl4R
– Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) December 26, 2025
The case shows how Polymarket is evolving beyond simple prediction betting to a more complex trading venue, where speed, discipline and a deep understanding of market mechanics can surpass intuition and headlines.


Disclaimer
The information provided by Altcoin Buzz does not constitute financial advice. It is intended for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. Any opinions or strategies shared are those of the editors/reviewers, and their risk tolerance may differ from yours. We are not responsible for any losses you may incur as a result of investments related to the information provided. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are high-risk assets; therefore, perform thorough due diligence. Copyright Altcoin Buzz Pte Ltd.


