Close Menu
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Categories
  • Altcoins (2,164)
  • Analysis (2,324)
  • Bitcoin (2,921)
  • Blockchain (1,794)
  • DeFi (2,117)
  • Ethereum (2,094)
  • Event (72)
  • Exclusive Deep Dive (1)
  • Landscape Ads (2)
  • Market (2,161)
  • Press Releases (10)
  • Reddit (1,581)
  • Regulation (2,028)
  • Security (2,803)
  • Thought Leadership (3)
  • Videos (43)
Hand picked
  • BTC has closed above $100K for 170 days straight
  • SCA is available for exchange!
  • Copper Founder Bron Labs Lets Crypto Users Recover Lost Wallets With Guardian Approval
  • Announcement – Launch of the Blockchain Career Accelerator program
  • New crypto regulations: friend or foe of startups?
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Events
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
Home»Market»The hearing of the structure of the crypto market is transformed into partisan claims
Market

The hearing of the structure of the crypto market is transformed into partisan claims

June 8, 2025No Comments
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
019745e7 67f3 7ed9 b160 e36fcfc4a90e.jpeg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Republican legislators of the Chamber’s Financial Services Committee (HFSC) have rejected the concerns that US President Donald Trump could personally benefit from his exposure to cryptographic industry, rejecting claims as political “theaters” in the midst of the ongoing debate on digital asset legislation.

During a June 6 hearing organized by the Democrats, the member of the HFSC classification, Maxine Waters, defended that the legislators should focus on “the information that was not explored at the committee hearing” on June 4, which concerned concerns concerning the law on the clarity of the digital asset market (clarity). The debate around the bill on the structure of the crypto market, which is expected to go to a vote on June 10, was partly observed by calls for provisions to prevent Trump from potentially using the legislation in personal benefit.