Federal investigation reveals complex financial network
Geoffrey K. Auyeung, 47, of Newcastle, Washington, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. The case involves nearly $100 million in investor funds that were transferred through a complex network of shell companies, offshore accounts and cryptocurrency exchanges.
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Washington, Auyeung created nine different entities to receive money from investors. These companies had names like Sea Forest International LLC, Apex Oil and Gas Trading LLC and Navigator Energy Logistics LLC. Investors thought they were securing storage of oil reservoirs in places like Rotterdam or Houston, but funds were actually being redirected through multiple financial channels.
How the money moved through the system
Once investors’ money arrived in accounts controlled by Auyeung, it was quickly transferred elsewhere. Some funds were transferred to other bank accounts, others were transferred abroad and large sums were used to purchase cryptocurrencies. Purchases included Bitcoin, Tether, USD Coin and Ethereum through exchanges like Gemini, Bitstamp and Coinbase.
What’s interesting – or perhaps worrying – is that much of this cryptocurrency was then transferred to accounts at Binance. These Binance accounts were controlled by individuals located in Nigeria and Russia. Once the money was transferred, victims received no further information about their investments. Auyeung and others simply stopped responding to them.
The scale of the operation
The numbers here are substantial. Investigators traced $97.1 million in domestic and international wire transfers and deposits through accounts linked to Auyeung between June 2022 and July 2024. About $24.7 million of that sum was linked to approximately 35 victims.
Auyeung opened at least 81 different bank accounts with 24 different financial institutions. He also opened 19 accounts on eight different cryptocurrency exchanges. That’s a lot of accounts to manage, suggesting that this was not a small operation.
Court records indicate he received at least $4,078,348 in commissions for this activity. He also misled banks about the origin of the funds and his role when fraud complaints began to arrive. Even after his indictment in August 2024, he continued to communicate with the co-conspirators and accepted an additional $400,000 by routing deposits through accounts in his wife’s name.
Consequences and restitution
As part of his plea agreement, Auyeung agreed to pay $24,707,031 in restitution. He will also lose approximately $2.3 million in seized funds, an Audi SQ8, $7.1 million from cryptocurrency wallets and approximately $300,000 currently held in bank accounts.
Sentencing is scheduled for May 12, and prosecutors plan to recommend 63 months in prison. It’s been a little over five years, which seems relatively short considering the size of the operation, but I guess that’s how plea deals sometimes work.
This case highlights something important about cryptocurrency and financial fraud. The technology makes it easier to move money quickly across borders, but it also creates a trail that investigators can follow. The fact that authorities were able to trace the funds through multiple cryptocurrency exchanges suggests that while crypto can be used for money laundering, it is not necessarily anonymous as some people might think.
It should also be noted that this is not an isolated incident. Financial fraud schemes involving cryptocurrency continue to be subject to federal enforcement action. The Justice Department appears to be better at tracking these types of transactions, even when they involve multiple layers of financial institutions and cryptocurrency exchanges.
For investors, the lesson might be to be more careful about where they put their money. If something seems too good to be true – like investments in oil tank storage by unknown companies – it probably is. And once money is paid into certain types of cryptocurrency accounts, especially those controlled by individuals in other countries, it can be very difficult to get it back.
![]()



