So theres been this debate going around about what happens if quantum computers get powerful enough to hack old Bitcoin wallets. Someone posted a chart showing BTC crashing to $3 if that happened and sold off Satoshi's million coins.
Willy Woo jumped in saying that old school Bitcoin holders would actually buy that flash crash. His point is that the Bitcoin network itself would survive because most coins today aren’t “instantly exposed” to a quantum attack in the same way the oldest ones are (especially if you’re not reusing addresses).
Heres the issue tho. The numbers vary depending on how people count it, but it’s definitely “millions of BTC” that are more exposed. Some of it sits in really old formats like P2PK, and a bigger chunk is coins tied to reused addresses / situations where the public key is already known. Satoshi’s stash is part of that whole “very old coins” conversation people keep bringing up.
Adam Back who's been around since Bitcoin's early days says we dont need to worry for like 20-40 years. He thinks theres plenty of time to upgrade everyone to quantum-resistant security before any real threat emerges. Standards for quantum-proof encryption already exist apparently.
The intresting part is that analyst James Check says the real risk isnt the technology itself but the market panic. He says theres "no chance" the Bitcoin community would agree to freeze Satoshi's coins before they get hacked, so if it happens we'd see massive selling pressure.
also, if panic trading actually hits, the boring stuff becomes painful fast. people will swap a ton, move coins around, maybe jump chains. and then months later you’re trying to untangle what you did. tools like awaken.tax are basically for that exact mess, just keeping cost basis and reports clean when things get chaotic.
Personally I think if quantum computers advanced that fast we'd have bigger problems than Bitcoin prices lol. But its worth keeping an eye on how the community handles this debate.
