Close Menu
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Categories
  • Altcoins (3,503)
  • Analysis (3,616)
  • Bitcoin (4,237)
  • Blockchain (2,157)
  • DeFi (2,623)
  • Ethereum (2,752)
  • Event (119)
  • Exclusive Deep Dive (1)
  • Landscape Ads (2)
  • Market (2,714)
  • Press Releases (12)
  • Reddit (2,847)
  • Regulation (2,474)
  • Security (3,955)
  • Thought Leadership (3)
  • Videos (44)
Hand picked
  • A small validation flaw, a loss of $2.19 million: what went wrong at Aztec Network?
  • Bitcoin Records Second Largest Unrealized Loss in History Despite Market Pressure
  • Asentum’s Euler upgrade goes live, paving the way for its next phase of growth
  • VARA pushes Dubai crypto firms to follow FATF blacklists, strengthen risk controls
  • Charles Hoskinson relies on $70M BTC payment from Manx entity 2016: Critics want paper trail
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Events
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
Home»Altcoins»A small validation flaw, a loss of $2.19 million: what went wrong at Aztec Network?
Altcoins

A small validation flaw, a loss of $2.19 million: what went wrong at Aztec Network?

June 16, 2026No Comments
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Aztec Network’s router contract is in the news after being the subject of a suspicious transaction discovered on the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain. This resulted in the loss of assets valued at approximately $2.19 million.

In fact, the wallet address “0x0f18….edd17” used money from the protocol’s router contract to complete the transaction.

The attack was suspiciousThe attack was suspicious
The attack was suspicious

According to CertiK, the attack was “suspicious” because the attacker could have taken advantage of a weakness in the smart contract, gained unauthorized access to protocol funds, or modified contract logic to siphon assets.

A possible smart contract validation flaw

However, there are indications that the protocol’s handling of proof data was flawed in the smart contract validation process. The problem seemed to specifically come from the function calculateRootHashes()who oversaw the confirmation of the legitimacy of the information provided _proofData but I have only examined the first part of it.

However, the middle part of the same _proofData the payload contained the data that processDepositsAndWithdrawals() then used to perform token transfers.

Therefore, an attacker could have created a malicious proof in which the unverified middle section contained manipulated deposit or withdrawal instructions, while the verified part remained valid and passed the protocol’s security checks.

In turn, the contract ended up making unauthorized token transfers because these instructions were not properly authenticated before processing. Simply put, there appears to be a gap between what was verified and what was actually executed.

Other incidents of this type

The timing here is interesting because Raydium also found a coding error in its old AMM V3 program that caused $1.34 million worth of cryptocurrencies to be stolen from five pools.

Meanwhile, another governance takeover attack saw an exploiter steal around $1.5 million in Ethereum from a Balancer liquidity pool.

A new exploit targeting Ethereum’s Alephium TokenBridge was also discovered recently. In this exploit, $815,000 was drained in seven minutes using three of four compromised guardian keys that signed fake VAAs (Verified Action Approvals).

Similarly, according to an independent investigation by Quantstamp, Humanity Protocol linked a targeted phishing attack against one of its principals to the attacker’s acquisition of administrative credentials, contract upgrades, transfers of Ethereum tokens, and the creation of new H tokens on the BNB chain.

Overall, the total value hacked (USD) has now reached $81.73 million in 30 days, according to data from DeFiLlama. With $634.85 million lost in 2026 alone, April saw the highest value drained so far.

2026 value sold out2026 value sold out
Source: DeFiLlama

Final summary

  • The flaw appears to have been caused by an incomplete verification of _proofData.
  • This episode is the most recent in a series of DeFi security breaches.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleBitcoin Records Second Largest Unrealized Loss in History Despite Market Pressure

Related Posts

Altcoins

Charles Hoskinson relies on $70M BTC payment from Manx entity 2016: Critics want paper trail

June 15, 2026
Altcoins

Hyperliquid – HYPE has ONE hurdle before $72-$74 appears

June 15, 2026
Altcoins

Trump USD1 Crypto Stablecoin Debuts as Fighter Bonus Currency at White House UFC Event

June 15, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Single Page Post
Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Featured Content
Event

Dutch Blockchain Week 2026 strengthens position as Europe’s leading B2B blockchain event week

April 14, 2026

Amsterdam, April 2026 – Dutch Blockchain Week 2026 is rapidly evolving into one of Europe’s…

Event

Global Games Show Riyadh: The Ultimate Creator & Influencer Hub

March 31, 2026

The fast-evolving gaming ecosystem of Riyadh is powered by solid national investment, a flourishing esports…

1 2 3 … 82 Next
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

A small validation flaw, a loss of $2.19 million: what went wrong at Aztec Network?

June 16, 2026

Charles Hoskinson relies on $70M BTC payment from Manx entity 2016: Critics want paper trail

June 15, 2026

Hyperliquid – HYPE has ONE hurdle before $72-$74 appears

June 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
© 2026 Altcoin Observer. all rights reserved by Tech Team.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 66,287.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,791.46
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.999381
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 614.83
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.23
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.99978
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 73.73
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.318602
figure-heloc
Figure Heloc (FIGR_HELOC) $ 1.03
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,265.05