Blackrock representatives met the Crypto Working Group of Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States (SEC) on May 9 to ask for advice on a range of cryptographic regulatory questions, including tokenization executives, development and approval executives for products negotiated on the stock market (FTE).
According to the Memo of ReunionBlackrock examined its digital asset offers, including the Ishares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), the proposed Ishares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) and the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL).
The company took advantage of the opportunity to request comments on how current and future products could be regulated under federal securities laws, in particular as the digital asset market matures.
Reunion included higher regulatory business representatives, digital assets, digital assets and ETFs. After a previous session on April 1, Blackrock continues to engage with the dry on cryptographic policy.
Last month, the company discussed the technical elements of the redemptions in kind for cryptographic ETPs and shared a detailed document on existing workflows within the framework of the current treasury model.
In addition, the company explained how these systems could adapt to support alternative models for cryptography -based funds.
Product scope and regulatory ambitions
Blackrock also underlined his views on the integration of the implementation characteristics in ETPs, aligning with other recent proposals of the industry examined by the SEC.
The markup has become a central problem in the current discussions as to whether exposure to assets of proof within ETPs can be designed to meet regulatory expectations without compromising liquidity or protections of investors.
The meeting also discussed tokenization, BlackRock asking for comments on how tokenization efforts could be structured in the context of existing securities. Tokenization is the process of representing traditional assets in blockchain as digital tokens.
The company has also suggested provisional standards for ETP Crypto issuers, asking the dry to consider the codified advice which could apply before the larger regulations.
Blackrock also discussed the criteria under article 6 (b) of the exchange law which could be used to assess whether an ETP Crypto satisfies the regulatory thresholds for the list of exchanges. These criteria include market integrity assessments and investor guarantees.
Finally, the meeting with the working group of the dry crypto has covered options on ETP Crypto, with technical questions raising BlackRock on the position and the limits of exercise. The company requested clarity on the way in which these limits could be structured concerning the liquidity thresholds for the actions of crypto or underlying ETPs.