Close Menu
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Categories
  • Altcoins (2,644)
  • Analysis (2,791)
  • Bitcoin (3,399)
  • Blockchain (2,068)
  • DeFi (2,498)
  • Ethereum (2,362)
  • Event (98)
  • Exclusive Deep Dive (1)
  • Landscape Ads (2)
  • Market (2,560)
  • Press Releases (10)
  • Reddit (2,071)
  • Regulation (2,376)
  • Security (3,265)
  • Thought Leadership (3)
  • Videos (43)
Hand picked
  • PlanX Conference 2026: Designing Borderless Capital in a Fragmented World
  • Hi, why on earth does Celestia allow scams to be on the memo on celenium.io!!!
  • ACU is available for exchange!
  • Pendle replaces vePENDLE with a more flexible sPENDLE –
  • Pump Fun Launches Pump Ventures Fund With $3M Hackathon: Is Solana Season Coming Back?
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
  • Regulation
  • Bitcoin
  • Altcoins
  • Market
  • Analysis
  • DeFi
  • Security
  • Ethereum
Events
Altcoin ObserverAltcoin Observer
Home»Regulation»Singapore incorporated companies targeting Crypto Offshore customers must obtain a license or leave – Ledger Insights
Regulation

Singapore incorporated companies targeting Crypto Offshore customers must obtain a license or leave – Ledger Insights

June 6, 2025No Comments
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Singapore cryptocurrency.2.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


The Singapore monetary authority (Mas) announced the results of one of its latest consultations which have an impact these companies can be formed in Singapore but must cease operations by the end of the month (June 30, 2025) or obtain a license, which, according to Mas, would only rarely be granted.

This decision stems from the legislation which divides the license of “digital token service providers” in those who provide services to Singapore compared to others who target offshore customers. Service providers active in Singapore must be approved in accordance with the Payment Services Act, while those who target offshore customers fall under the law on financial services and markets.

Mas is concerned about the impact of potential reputation on Singapore where companies register in Singapore for tax purposes, but do not actually provide services in Singapore or do not present any significant presence. Silver whitening is a key concern, especially if the main operations are outside Singapore, which makes the MAS difficult to exercise surveillance. This surveillance challenge is the reason why Mas will rarely grant licenses to companies focused on tenders – without contact points in Singapore, effective regulation becomes almost impossible.

Following the two laws, Mas implemented two sets of regulations. Payment service licenses for digital tokens in Singapore have been operational for some time, while offshore regulations have not been implemented so far. When Mas consulted in October, he warned that there would be no long transition period, probably to encourage companies to start offering land operations and obtain a license, or to leave Singapore completely.

Several high -level companies such as Circle and Paxos already have licenses such as main payment institutions and have Singapore operations, so would not be affected by these new regulations.

In Singapore or outside?

On Linkedin, Gibson Dunn’s lawyers have debated nuances of what it means to be “ “ à Singapore ” against “ `outside of Singapore ”, noting that it is not only a question of managing the customers of Singapore, but also of having operations in Singapore – strengthening the position of MAS on supervision requirements.




Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleThe price of bitcoin drops today below $ 105,000 in the middle of continuous sales per crypto whales
Next Article Bitcoin Slee, Tesla Plipting in the middle of the shock Elon Musk-Trump

Related Posts

Regulation

The crypto-bank belongs to the federal regulatory perimeter

January 21, 2026
Regulation

Has Latin America Overtaken the US in Crypto Oversight? El Salvador makes its case.

January 20, 2026
Regulation

Senate Delay in CLARITY Act Creates Uncertainty

January 20, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Single Page Post
Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Featured Content
Event

PlanX Conference 2026: Designing Borderless Capital in a Fragmented World

January 21, 2026

Dubai, UAE – January, 2026 – PlanX 2026 will take place on April 27–28, 2026…

Event

Digital Assets Forum Expands to Two Days in London, Uniting Traditional Finance and the Digital Assets Industry

January 16, 2026

Following two sold-out editions, Europe’s premier digital assets conference returns to London, doubling in size…

1 2 3 … 71 Next
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Pendle replaces vePENDLE with a more flexible sPENDLE –

January 21, 2026

ONDO Whales Withdraw $14 Million – Is the Market Preparing for a Reversal?

January 21, 2026

Institutional Investors Invest $2,170,000,000 in Bitcoin and Crypto Assets in One Week: CoinShares

January 21, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Contact us
© 2026 Altcoin Observer. all rights reserved by Tech Team.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 87,869.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,901.61
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.999176
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 869.81
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.89
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999622
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.298018
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,902.89
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.122635
figure-heloc
Figure Heloc (FIGR_HELOC) $ 1.04