The main developer of the Ethereum Foundation, Tim Beiko, rejected the idea of an Ethereum blockchain decline after the Hack bybit Crypto Exchange. In a detailed article on X, Beiko explained why such a proposal is not practical and unrealizable.
Ethereum Network too interconnected for a decline, says Beiko
On February 21, the Dubai -based exchange of exchange underwent the greatest harassment of cryptography in history while the bad players removed $ 1.4 billion in Eth Eths (Meth) from the coat and D ‘Other ERC-20 tokens including one of the cold exchange portfolios. As expected, this development has shaken the industry making a discourse on various recovery channels.
One of these channels discussed is the potential decline in the Ethereum network. As the name suggests, the blockchain hindsight is the blockchain’s reversal process to a previous state, effectively canceling recent transactions.
According to Tim Beiko, the idea of a blockchain decline can be attributed to a Bitcoin network incident in 2010 where Satoshi Nakamoto has deployed a software fix to invalidate a transaction where a user struck 146 billion BTC. However, the software developer notes that Bitcoin extraction efforts were minimal at present, the first cryptocurrency negotiating around $ 0.07.
Beiko also refers to a similar incident on the Ethereum network in 2016, where a particular DAPP known as Thedao which held around 15% of ETH’s offer is under the control of a pirate. Fortunately, Thedao developers had implemented security that faithfully gave birth to all withdrawals from the DAPP for a month in the case of hacking.
This time, the developers of Ethereum made it possible to make a change at the blockchain, to the manually update of the Thedao database in an “irregular change of state”. In particular, this decision caused a lot of division in the ETH community, which ultimately led the Hardfork which created the classic Ethereum channel.
In the context of Bybit’s hacking, Beiko explains that a blockchain decline would be practically impossible due to several factors. First, the Ethereum network does not detect any broken protocol rule when hacking occurred via a compromised multi-Sigs portfolio interface where the goalkeeper has signed on a falsely displayed transaction resulting in loss of assets.
In addition, the developer ETH notes that the pirate has started to transfer stolen funds, unlike the Thedao affair. Consequently, any attempt to decline would cause a continuous cat and mouse game. Finally, the Ethereum network is too developed and interconnected with the presence of multiple bridges and Defi protocols, therefore another “irregular change of state” could cause a catastrophic training effect.
Presentation of ETH prices
At the time of writing the editorial staff, the ETH is negotiated at $ 2,754 reflecting a gain of 2.77% in the last day.
Istock star image, tradingview graphic
