
The Ethereum Foundation has published a radical update of its Treasury management strategy, signaling a more mature and structured approach to capital allowance in the growing global influence and the rise of ETH.
The new executive, published on June 4, explains how the Foundation will manage the reserves, will deploy capital in the protocols DEFI and will assess confidentiality standards, while maintaining Ethere’s ideological commitment to self-association and neutrality.
The policy introduces a formal operating model of assets which links operational expenses to a fixed percentage of the Treasury of the Foundation and a multi -year reserve track.
It also establishes detailed guidelines for ETH sales, Stablecoin titles and chain deployments, marking a notable department of the historically passive capital position of the Foundation.
Post-fusion, Rampant Ethereum
After the transition to evidence of the evidence and approval of January 2024 of the FNB ETHEREUM ETFS, listed in the United States, capital entries and the innovation of the application layer accelerated.
However, growth has come from complexity, volatility and new pressures for stewardship. The updated framework arrives at a pivotal time for Ethereum and the recent concerns of its community.
To manage the risks, the foundation adopted a double variable treasure formula which calculates the Fiat reserve needs by multiplying a target of fixed operating expenses, currently set at 15%, by a 2.5 -year track.
This determines the amount of ETH can be sold safely in Fiat or Stable assets. The activity of the treasure will now follow a counterattack model, with more aggressive support during market slowdowns and moderation of bull cycles.
While Ethereum remains the cornerstone of the Treasury, the new EF directives allow a broader exposure to chain opportunities, including stalement, loans, tokenized assets and carefully verified challenge protocols.
The change suggests a more active approach to treasure management, balancing the generation of elements with ideological and risk constraints.
Confidentiality as a principle, not the preference
Among the most decisive elements of politics, there is a codified commitment to privacy, which the foundation considers “essential civil freedom” in an increasingly monitored financial landscape.
The directives reflect an increasing concern in the Ethereum community concerning the rise of KYC-IN-GATED applications, centralized user interfaces and excessive dependence on legal protections outside the chain.
Thanks to a new internal section called “Defipunk”, EF will evaluate potential DEFI partners through a range of criteria: access without authorization, self-care, open source license and technical confidentiality features such as the armor of transactions.
Failure protocols can still be eligible, but only if they demonstrate credible progress towards these ideals. This marks a rare institutional effort to inject normative standards into decentralized finance – an industry often more motivated by incentives than ethics.
However, this can also contradict regulatory trends in the United States and Europe, where political decision-makers have increasingly prioritized transparency and compliance on cryptographic privacy.
EF internal operations will also be subject to these standards. Staff working on the deployment of the Treasury should use tools preserving confidentiality and contributing to the open source infrastructure, a decision aimed at establishing a higher bar for ideological alignment.


