Clarity Act News: The Digital Chamber, a cryptocurrency advocacy organization with more than 250 members, has ramped up a coordinated lobbying campaign urging the U.S. Senate to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), officially numbered HR 3633, presenting the bill as the industry’s last realistic legislative window for federal market structure rules before Congress adjourns for its summer recess.
The campaign, which now encompasses more than 100 crypto companies alongside parallel tracks run by the Crypto Council for Innovation and the Blockchain Association, follows the Senate Banking Committee’s 15-9 bipartisan advancement of HR 3633 on May 14, 2026.
Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone has publicly stated that ethics provisions still embedded in the bill will be resolved before Senate leaders schedule a floor vote.
Congress is finally on the verge of establishing clear, common-sense rules for digital assets. The Clarity Act protects everyday users and ensures that American innovation is not pushed abroad. Don’t let red tape kill innovation. Tell your senator to vote YES: pic.twitter.com/q2lZkxM6QZ
– The Digital Chamber (@DigitalChamber) May 28, 2026
This is not just a common example of crypto lobbying pressuring Congress for favorable treatment. It is a precisely timed institutional intervention designed to close the procedural gap between committee advancement and session scheduling, the specific window in which bills with bipartisan momentum most often stall due to the arithmetic of the filibuster, competing calendar priorities, and coordinated opposition, while simultaneously creating a legislative record that reframes the industry’s central grievance: a decade of regulation by enforcement led by one-man action. agency rather than by statutory authority.
DISCOVER: Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026
Clarity Act News: CLARITY Act Legislative Status: Senate Arithmetic, Committee Reconciliation Requirements and August Calendar Window
The CLARITY Act passed the U.S. House of Representatives in July 2025 by a margin of 294-134, establishing a broad bipartisan base before the bill moved to the Senate. The Senate Banking Committee advanced 15-9 on May 14, 2026, with Democrat Ruben Gallego (Democrat of Arizona) joining all 13 Republicans to vote in favor. constitutes the bill’s second major procedural step, but the path to a vote in the Senate remains structurally complicated.
The Banking Committee’s version must first be reconciled with a separate version proposed by the Senate Agriculture Committee, a merger process that involves the primary SEC vs. CFTC jurisdictional division of the bill before any floor planning can take place.

The mechanism works as follows: The CLARITY Act would formally divide oversight of digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) by introducing a statutory definition of “digital commodities” and a “mature blockchain” test, measuring token concentration, governance dispersion and network usage, to determine when a given token moves from securities jurisdiction to commodities jurisdiction.
This framework would replace the current enforcement-driven environment, in which the SEC applies the Howey test on a case-by-case basis without binding safeguards, with a statutory architecture that asset managers, payment processors, and fintech companies could rely on to make capital deployment decisions.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis has indicated that a floor vote could occur by August 2026, but the bill requires 60 votes to clear the Senate filibuster threshold, a numerical bar that requires material Democratic support beyond the single committee already secured.
The bill’s implications for stablecoin regulation, while secondary to its market structure provisions, have attracted particular attention from payments-focused companies. Supporters argue that the CLARITY Act would clarify which tokens fall under the commodity rules, making the integration of banks and payment stablecoins operationally viable in a way that the current application-only environment precludes.
Coinbase has separately argued that the bill directly addresses the SEC’s regulatory overreach, a position that structurally aligns with the House Digital’s anti-regulatory enforcement argument.
DISCOVER: Coin Supercycle: Top Performers This Week
Digital Chamber Campaign: What the Coalition Demands and Why the Strategic Logic Extends Beyond the Stated Policy Goal
The Digital Chamber’s April letter to the Senate Banking Committee flagged what the industry describes as Operation Choke Point 2.0, an informal pressure campaign in which federal regulators applied banking pressure to crypto companies without formal regulation, as the specific harm that the CLARITY Act would address by forcing agency conduct through a statutory channel subject to congressional oversight.
CEO Cody Carbone argued publicly that the ethics agreement surrounding public officials profiting from crypto, a provision linked to the Trump family’s involvement in crypto and flagged by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) as unresolved, would be finalized before the bill reached the floor. Its wording specifies: that Senate leaders “will only present it if they are sure of having 60,” indicates that the coalition is aiming for certainty in the vote count rather than simply access to the floor.
It is already too easy for our adversaries to exploit cryptocurrencies to move billions.
We should strengthen standards, without creating new loopholes that our adversaries can exploit.
The Clarity Act should not be passed as written. pic.twitter.com/hXIjjhXKyl
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) May 28, 2026
Coalition members including Coinbase, Ripple, Kraken, Circle, Andreessen Horowitz and Paradigm, coordinated by the Digital Chamber, the Blockchain Association and the Crypto Council for Innovation, with Stand With Crypto issuing a parallel constituent call to action, represent a degree of industry alignment that has not been consistently present in previous legislative cycles.
We suspect that the secondary institutional function of the campaign is to create a documented lobbying record that strengthens the industry’s litigation and regulatory posture in the event the bill fails in Congress, demonstrating coordinated statutory intent that can be cited in subsequent agency proceedings and in judicial review of enforcement actions.
following
Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article is intended to provide accurate and current information, but should not be considered financial or investment advice. Because market conditions can change quickly, we encourage you to verify the information for yourself and consult a professional before making any decisions based on this content.

Neil is a professional cryptocurrency content writer with years of experience. He has written for various cryptocurrency websites to report on the latest news and has been hired by all kinds of cryptocurrency projects, to create content that would increase their visibility and attract more potential investors.
Neil Mathew on LinkedIn


