The co-founder of Ethereum Vitalik Buterin has described a new approach to improve the speed and scalability of the network by rethinking the structure of the finality of the blocks.
In a blog article on August 1, Buterin proposed to separate the mechanism of choice from the Ethereum fork from its purpose process, which, according to him, could simplify the protocol and allow faster confirmations of blocks.
Ethereum consensus is currently based on a design based on locations, where the mechanisms of choice of fork and finality work in the same window.
Although robust, this design requires several cycles of communication from the validator during each location, limiting the speed with which the new blocks can be confirmed.
Given this, Buterin suggests reducing complexity by allowing the two processes to evolve independently. He wrote:
“(There) may be (a means) to move away from the tight coupling between the locations and the finality introduced in 3SF, and rather have a more separate GHOST LMD fork and a gadget of finality, with different counties of the participants.”
A two -level system
As part of its plan, Buterin proposes to award a small fixed number of validators, around 256, to execute the algorithm of choice of fork, LMD GHOST, on a base by location. This group would quickly determine the head of the chain in real time, acting as “Fast Lane” of Ethereum for the selection of blocks.
Meanwhile, a wider validators set on a slower rate would manage the purpose process, which determines which blocks become irreversible.
This split could allow Ethereum to reduce the number of communication towers by location of three or four to two, which makes the network more reactive without sacrificing the integrity of the consensus.
Buterin stressed that its proposed architecture has broader implications for the scalability of Ethereum.
He said that this decision would allow the network to shorten the slot machine times and manage a larger validator swimming pool safely. This could evolve to a million participants without introducing significant general costs or relying on complex cryptographic tips.
Buterin also argued that such a system would keep Ethereum safely while simplifying its internal operations. This would also give developers more flexibility to upgrade or exchange finality mechanisms over time, without disturbing the logic of choosing the basic fork.
Meanwhile, the proposal is still in the research phase and is open to pursuing the comments of the community.
Nevertheless, it marks an important step towards the rationalization of Ethereum’s performance as the network evolves towards a more efficient and scalable platform.
Mentioned in this article
(Tagstotranslate) Ethereum
Source link
